[TYPO3-ect] Summing it up: Your opinions upon keyname

[Elmar Hinz]

Hello typoniks,

after 3 days have passed let's come to an result. Firts thanks to
those who have made proposals.  The few statements we got differ very
much, but I can make out 2 results:

1.) for most of posters it is not so interesting or undisired that
ECT's library contains ECT component in the name.

2.) from Kasper's proposal and the little engagement of the members we
can make out that it would become rather difficult to get rid of the
tx_ prefix.

Taking both into account and thinking it important to have a short
name I extract this as a result:

a.) for classes: ext                =>   tx_ext_link
b.) for functions: div              =>   tx_div

a.) is similar to the most proposals (Peter, Ingo, Ernesto, Jeff,
etc.). b.) is one of the shortes calls for static functions. It
contains T for typo3, X for extension and DIV like we are used to it
from t3lib_div.

If someone thinks there is something very wrong with this conclusion,
it is still early enough to change it.

Regards

Elmar