[TYPO3-ect] Your opinions upon keyname

[Elmar Hinz]

Hello girls,

the first part of our common ECT library, the link class works pretty
fine and has passed a lot of tests. Before anybody can work with it
she want's security upon the persistance of registration key. Also to
write documentation I would like to know the final keyname.

Still we have not come to a solution that is carried by a broad conset
of ECT supporters. So please bring in your opinion.

Variant A: ect
Variant B: ext
Variant C: ect_div + ect_lib
Variant D: div + lib

Details:

Variant A: ect
A.1) With own namespace:    ect_div::somewhat(),    class: ect_link
A.2) Without own namespace: tx_ect_div::somewhat(), class: tx_ect_link

Variant B: ext
B.1) With own namespace:    ext_div::somewhat(),    class: ext_link
B.2) Without own namespace: tx_ext_div::somewhat(), class: tx_ext_link

Variant C: ect_div + ect_lib
C.1) WON:  ect_div::somewhat(),   class: ect_lib_link
C.2) WOON: tx_ectdiv::somewhat(), class: tx_ectlib_link

Variant D: div + lib
D) WOON: tx_div::somewhat(), class: tx_lib_link


Hoping that you will bring this towards a good decision now. Please
take in account that the names you will use should be short and easy
to remember.


Regards

Elmar