[TYPO3-core] RFC: #10118: Make pi_wrapInBaseClass wraps configurable

[Francois Suter]

Hi,

> 2. .baseWrap should be named .pi_baseWrap, as baseWrap could have been
> used for other options already in extensions. Also, there is a
> difference between a baseWrap and a baseStdWrap, I only expected
> baseWrap to be a wrap functionality, but this sounds like a complete
> .stdWrap functionality which could / should be put around the USER /
> USER_INT CObjects.

Yes, please definitely avoid "baseWrap", as I use it in some of my 
extensions and I'm probably not the only one.

I would agree with Steffen K. that plain "stdWrap" sounds good and familiar.

Cheers

-- 

Francois Suter
Cobweb Development Sarl - http://www.cobweb.ch