[TYPO3-core] XAVIER PLEASE! was: Re: RFC: #12652: Value Preview of empty timestamp shows "01-01-70 (-40 yrs) "

Mathias Schreiber [wmdb >] mathias.schreiber at wmdb.de
Mon Dec 7 15:13:30 CET 2009

Dmitry Dulepov schrieb:
> If we want to do it properly, we should change all date/time fields from 
> int to datetime and use those. Then we can assign proper defaults (such 
> as '0000-00-00' and '2099-12-31' and do very simple checks in SQL.

Good idea.
Are there any implications with DBAL or do adoDB's datetime functions 
cover this change?

Right now we'd need to rewrite enableFields throughout the core (plus 
this would be a rather big change to all extensions using "enableFields()".

But still: YES PLEASE!

TYPO3 certified interogator
T3DD09 Entertainer

More information about the TYPO3-team-core mailing list