[TYPO3-team-core-v5] GSOC: Neos SiteKickstarter & FluidBuilder

[Rens Admiraal]

Hey Jacob,

Personally I would love some "cut, divide and conquer" sitekickstarter 
package in which you just load the templates somebody made, and can 
start creating the site...

As you're still finetuning your idea... What if you could recognize 
available viewhelpers and drag / drop them into the template... or 
recognize the available sections / parts in typoscript to drag into the 
template... Select what parts of the HTML should be extracted to be a 
partial, select the layout parts, and so on... ;-)

There was some guy in the IRC channel speaking about his biggest 
argument for using TemplaVoila instead of Fluid: the graphical user 
interface for the mapping. Besides that he disliked the fact that he had 
to split up the template manually and move them into the Templates / 
Partials / Layouts folder. Especially if they for example received an 
update of the HTML templating and had to process that again...

Just some ideas ;)

Greetz,
Rens

Op 4/22/13 16:00 , Jacob Floyd schreef:
> Hey all,
>
> Aske suggested I post my question here instead of IRC, so le voilà:
>
> I'm working on a GSOC application to work with TYPO3 Neos over the summer.
>
> Christian added the idea to make SiteKickstarter (
> http://bit.ly/T3GSOC-SK ) add in common html/css frameworks (HTML5BP,
> Bootstrap,...) And I was thinking of maybe working on a fluid template
> builder to complement that. (I've talked about the idea of a
> FluidBuilder before. I think the FormBuilder models some of what I'd
> like to do -- http://bit.ly/FluidBConcept).
>
> The idea is rough at this point and "needs probably a bit more thought
> and cleanup" (ChristianM in IRC). So, what do you think of the idea?
> What do you want to see happen with the SiteKickstarter and some kind of
> Template/Fluid Builder?
>
> Thanks,
> Jacob Floyd
>
> PS I've been absent from the TYPO3 world for the past few months because
> I got married and then started a semester of school. :) I'm excited to
> be contributing again. Sadly, GSOC doesn't consider documentation-only
> proposals, so I'm branching out--I'm looking for something I could do
> that would be very useful in increasing neos adoption.