[TYPO3-mvc] Harmonization and Streamlining of CMS Fluid and FLOW Fluid
Markus Klein
klein.t3 at reelworx.at
Mon Mar 23 13:58:29 CET 2015
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> Markus Klein wrote:
>
> > The only thing is that we have to find a backwards compatible solution
> > to mix the Fluid-shipped VHs with the product-shipped VHs in the same
> > namespace (f), otherwise we'll get a breaking change.
>
> I already said more than a year ago, that product-shipped VHs need to be
> moved to their corresponding package.
> E.g. in CMS the cObject viewhelper should be part of frontend and not fluid,
> f:be.* should be in backend, etc.
>
> Then we would not have this problem now.
Well, yes and no. What about the f:link.action viewhelper? You need it in BE and FE, so why duplicate it?
I'd rather do the separation in terms of "what applies where". Link-VHs are product-specific, but yet FE/BE independent. Control-Structures (for, if, switch) are product-independent and are more like a "language feature", hence it should be part of Fluid itself.
>
> Best regards
> --
> Philipp Gampe – PGP-Key 0AD96065 – TYPO3 UG Bonn/Köln Documentation
> – Active contributor TYPO3 CMS
> TYPO3 .... inspiring people to share!
>
Kind regards
Markus
------------------------------------------------------------
Markus Klein
TYPO3 CMS Active Contributors Team Member
More information about the TYPO3-project-typo3v4mvc
mailing list