[TYPO3-mvc] [!!!] FYI: Implemented first version of single table inheritance.

[Thomas "Thasmo" Deinhamer]

Isn't that too restricted? I'd "attach" templates
to controller actions, as it is now. The output
of model data could be done via partials or viewhelpers?!

Maybe this can be solved using an if viewhelper which
could decide which template/partial should be used.
(Maybe we can introduce a new model viewhelper which
would take care of getting the right model-template.
Maybe that's what you're refering to? I'm not sure.)

Thomas

Am 30.04.2010 10:08, schrieb Jochen Rau:
> Hi Sebastian.
>
> On 28.04.10 11:25, Sebastian Kurfürst wrote:
>>> That sounds cool (from now on I try to use the word "cool" and
>>> "Scientific" as often as it makes sense ;-) ).
>>>
>>> Your idea might fit into the concept of overlays discussed in
>>> "[TYPO3-mvc] shared templates/partials? Or something like skin support
>>> for FLUID/FLOW3/ExtBase". Could you please open an issue for that, so we
>>> can keep track of this.
>> I think it's an interesting idea, but I'd suggest we discuss this
>> further... Right now I am a bit unsure if a template is a property of an
>> Controller _Object_ (which would mean NO inheritance), or if a template
>> is a property of a Controller _Class_ (which would mean inheritance).
>
> Another possibility: We could also attach the template to the domain
> model (of course it is not a property of the domain model ;-)). That's
> where the inheritance takes place. It's more like a micro MV(C) pattern.
>
> Let's take the original example again:
>
> Party
> | |
> Organization Person
> | |
> Company ScientificInstitution
>
> I'd like to deliver a default template for my domain model.
>
> my_ext/
> Ressources/
> Private/
> Domain/ <-- other suggestions?
> Model/
> Company.html
> Company.rdf
> Company.xml
> ScientificInstitution.html
> ScientificInstitution.rdf
> ScientificInstitution.xml
>
> Then I am able to write
>
> {company}
>
> in my main template of the action.
>
>
>> *Sorry, I'm in scientific mode right now* ;)
>
> Shame on you ;-)
>
> Jochen