[TYPO3-templavoila] All DS from all GRSP are shown/selectable in TO-Record

[Rutger Mik]

Thanks for your response.
I will look into it.

Regards,

Rutger Mik


Op 23-12-2011 16:07, Tolleiv Nietsch schreef:
> Hi,
> Christian also opened a bug report on bugs.typo3.org. Feel free to
> provide a patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Tolleiv
>
> Rutger Mik schrieb:
>> Hi Christian (and others),
>>
>> When looking to solve the same problem, I found your post here.
>> It's an old post, but never the less the problem still exists.
>>
>> I spoke to a some other TYPO3 integrators, and though it is not
>> recognised as such, they all experienced this as a major problem.
>>
>>
>> We, for example, have a TYPO3 installation with many different websites
>> for different customers. We use this to put online a complete website
>> within the hour. Which works great.
>>
>> Due to my naming conventions, all the default page templates of a
>> customer is called 'TPL: default' (or 'FCE: default' for default FCE's).
>> This is getting very confusing, even after 2 websites.
>>
>>
>> I know this is not a bug, mainly because this is the expected result.
>> But why not adding a TSconfig option to turn off this behaviour?
>> This would help me (and many others) very much.
>>
>> The GRSP is there for a reason and I think this behaviour of TemplaVoila
>> makes TYPO3 less flexible.
>>
>> Any thoughs on this?
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Rutger
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 26-3-2011 11:35, Christian Tauscher schreef:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'd like to diskuss the following issue:
>>>
>>> http://bugs.typo3.org/view.php?id=17939
>>>
>>> Is it a feature or is it a annoying feature -> switch it off.
>>>
>>> I think its annoying and a bug, because:
>>>
>>> The bahavior bevore V 1.5.0 was correct as it respected the
>>> /G/eneral /R/ecord /S/torage /P/lace of a site.
>>>
>>> (btw: i am not really sure if this is the meaning of GRSP)
>>>
>>> Of cource you can define more than only one GRSP, but this is quite
>>> annoying and heavy to maintain.
>>>
>>> Back to topic:
>>>
>>> Typo3 is capable of storing multiple Websites within ONE Datatree. A
>>> feature wich i use quite often, as you ca see in the example screen on
>>> mantis. Its a kind of sandbox.
>>>
>>> So if TV starts to behave diffent with V1.5.0, and allways show all TO's
>>> of the whole tree, then the multi-site-feature becomes useless.
>>>
>>> OK, you can start giving individual Names for the TO/DS sets to tell
>>> them from each othe and not to mix up things, but this will lead to
>>> mistakes.
>>>
>>> One of my Projects: Numerous Micro-Sites for a companys salesmen. All
>>> are quite similar to each other, all of them use default
>>> TV-Wizard-Setup, but all of them have individual changes to fit certain
>>> needs.
>>> Ist nearly impossible to maintain my major "Micro-Site" with actually
>>> 134 individual customers since V1.5.0....
>>>
>>> If I'd like to share all sites all DS/TO, i'd set all Micro-Sites to use
>>> the same GRSP, but I prefer a clear separated structure.
>>>
>>>
>>> You see? What is your opinion about this?
>>> Did i miss to read a certain line in the docs?
>>>
>>>
>>> At least i would like to have a setup option to change back to the 1.4
>>> behaviour, but bevore I start this issue in Mantis, I'd like to hear
>>> your opinions.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Christian.
>>
>