[TYPO3-templavoila] MTB or FTB/TV

[Christian Wolff]

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:51:41 +0200, Simon Child <simon at srchild.com> wrote:

> For a simple site of a few pages (but which may have heavy traffic, and  
> some
> database intensive extensions), which gives the best performance,
> Templavoila or Modern Template Building/autoparser?
>
>

Hi Simon, i Whould guess it dosnet make much of a difference,
  bacause renderd pages are normaly stored in cache in both systems. and
and for USER_INT extensions are marker inserted in these cache data.
these markers are then replace with the output of the USER_INT object.
all other objects / plugins are cached.

of course the will bee differences if you have a lot of no cachable pages.
or short cache interval's.

i don't know if anybody has made rendering-speed tests with
TemplaVoila vs Classic Template

i whould guess that classic template (without auto parser)
is faster templaViola. because there is just some search & replace
going on.

greets chris

-- 
Christian Wolff // Berlin
http://www.connye.com

Latest Projects:
http://www.bizim-tur.de/ | http://www.flycall.de | http://www.atr24.de