[TYPO3-doc] Official docs: Mostly CamelCased now (to be pushed again)
    François Suter 
    fsu-lists at cobweb.ch
       
    Fri Jun  8 14:32:37 CEST 2012
    
    
  
Hi,
> * When cleaning up the files, we could introduce a "Readme.rst" at the root of the repository as a
> good practice. See below (1) if unclear. This files would contains info towards new users so that
> they would know at a glance what it is about. The content of the file could be "injected" in the
> main documentation by the include directive in file Index.rst whenever rendering. Readme file is a
> standard on many development platform and people are used to it.
I could imagine having such a file as a replacement for the current 
plain-text README, but I wouldn't reuse it in the documentation. The 
question is about it's real use. If it's not used in the documentation 
it does not need to be in reST. Plain-text is fine. On Github it's 
common to have the README in  markdown format. Does reST work too? If 
not, I would not impose any standard and let developers adopt whatever 
they feel works best (unless we get a Github-like feature on Forge).
> * Are we going to add a "ext_emconf.php" file? More than the need to install the documentation
> package in the Extension Manager, the file contains metadata information that are standardized
> across TYPO3 extensions that we can extract at the rendering stage...
The official documentation is not meant to be extensions anymore, so I 
would say no. I don't think we need that. And FLOW3 packages don't have 
that anyway, so it's a "standard" only with regards to actual TYPO3 v4/6 
extensions.
Cheers
-- 
Francois Suter
Cobweb Development Sarl - http://www.cobweb.ch
    
    
More information about the TYPO3-project-documentation
mailing list