[Typo3-marketing] Typo3 vs other CMS on contentmanager.de

[Kieran Given]

Hi Daniel,

is it not possible on http://www.contentmanager.de to have our logo put on
there.

I did a comparison of RedDot, webEdition, Contenido and typo3. Reddot had
their big red logo staring at you while the others didn't? It just looked
more professional! 

I also didn't like how Contenido called themselves 'a leading CMS in Open
Source'. Typo3's description is very flat and not very 'We've got the power
to do the job' description! :-)

Can you beef up typo3's description? I feel it's not adequate and is too
passive.

Kieran
http://www.given.de
mailto:info at given.de


Am 02.02.2004 10:19 Uhr schrieb Daniel Hinderink [TYPO3] unter
daniel at typo3.com:

> Hi,
> 
> I just updated the info.
> 
> 
>> although the given URL is almost only german, it might be interested to
>> others
>> as well:
>> On http://www.contentmanager.de you can find a big variety of CMS systems,
>> including
>> Typo3. I did a comparison of Typo3 against webEdition. I perfectly assume
>> that
>> webEdition
>> can do the same as Typo3, and vice versa. But in the comparison, it sounds as
>> if webEdition
>> can do more.
>> Examples:
>> Q: Which operating System are supported:
>> Typo3: Linux, all Windows from 9x on, Solaris
>> (my comment: We run it unter FreeBSD, and I bet there are more.)
> 
> There are some problems with FreeBSD and latest PHP, but I listed it anyway.
> 
>> webEdition: Client: All Systems that run Mozilla and/or Internet Explorer
>> (my comment: so does Typo3)
> 
> That of course is not true for the RTE, which most clients will expect for
> all platforms then.
> Anyway I did not change our list and it was more comprehensive anyway.
> 
>> Server: All Systems that run PHP4 and MySQL
>> (my comment: So does Typo3 I bet!)
> 
> I added that and even added IIS.
> 
>> Q: What webserver are supported?
>> Typo3: Apache
>> webEdition: All Servers that can run PHP4 and MySQL
>> (My commetn: I bet Typo3 can do this as well)
> 
> See above
> 
>> Q: Which technology/Architektur) wird verwendet?
>> Typo3: PHP
>> (my comment: I never heard of PHP as an architecture. Write client/server
>> instead, ...)
>> webEdition: 100% server based and uses only php and MySQL on the server
> 
> I changed this. It is not a client/server architecture however.
> 
> 
>> OK I stop here, you get the idea... Does anybody from here know who is
>> maintaining this Typo3
>> record on www.contentmanager.de? Or is he/she reading here, and willing to
>> grab ideas from this
>> list. If not totally inacceptable I would switch for this one topic to
>> german,
>> as it is
>> almost only german text on contentmanager.de, or we all run to
>> typo3-german at lists.netfielders.de
>> and discuss this topic there, as this list seems to be empty enough, ...?
> 
> Please go through it once more and see if you find more errors.
> 
>> Don't get me wrong: Many of the text I read there was great for Typo3, but I
>> noticed some
>> small typo3, and I thing some of the texts should be changed to market Typo3
>> better.
> 
> No problem, your suggestions are very welcome.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
>> 
>> regards
>> Juergen