[TYPO3-english] Rebranding: Get the green back

Mark Roemermann mark at nasaustralia.com.au
Tue Oct 9 07:09:57 CEST 2012


+1 for green.

Not fussed about the re-naming that much (a decision that could not hope 
to please everyone) but the logo colouring feels a bit arbitrary and (in 
the words of disafffected 20-somethings) 'meh'...

The green added that vital bit of lift.

MarkR

On 8/10/2012 9:13 PM, Kay Strobach wrote:
> definitly +1 - i missed that decision.
>
> Leave the CMS logo as it was! - Or lets the association logo be the one
> with green, what would mean, all brands use the 2 colored version, but
> may also use a simpler version!
>
> The Logo is more a brand than the word TYPO3 ...
>
> Regards
> Kay
>
> Am 08.10.2012 11:20, schrieb Anja Leichsenring:
>> to be honest, I feel the same regarding the green. It belongs there.
>>
>> So +1 for rethinking the all-orange-policy.
>>
>> greets
>> Anja
>>
>> Am 08.10.2012 10:34, schrieb Martin Bless:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm not interested in what happened when why and how in the past.
>>> I'm only interested in TYPO3 being successful. In this post I'm
>>> concentrating on the color change of the logo.
>>>
>>> Short and concise:
>>> ==================
>>> I watched the keynote of the T3CON. The reason(ing) I heard was:
.....
>>> dissonance or even a conflict. Don't do it for me - do it for
>>> TYPO3. It's worth it!
>>>
>>> still hoping ...
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>
>
>



More information about the TYPO3-english mailing list