[TYPO3-english] is TYPO3 for me

[Patrick Schriner]

If you are into general statements:

I have yet to see a meaningfull number of graphics that were capable of  
building decent HTML.

Cooperation for me means: I get at least a design, at best a template, and  
I adapt it to what the extension really needs // does (and: what makes  
sense in HTML/CSS).

Just take a look at e.g. the templates of "cal" and tell me that they are  
honestly better than what you do with Fluid.

On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:51:47 +0100, Tonix (Antonio Nati)  
<tonix at interazioni.it> wrote:

> Il 14/11/2012 11:38, Patrick Schriner ha scritto:
>>
>> In general Extbase suits better to more modern PHP approaches -  
>> encapsulation, abstraction, TDD or unit tests in general - than classic  
>> pi_base Extension development. Most Extbase extension we write tend to  
>> be a lot nicer (code-wise) and more maintainable then classic  
>> extensions.
>
> In general extbase makes any cooperation between graphics and  
> programmers useless, as templates written by graphics cannot be used  
> anymore, while the 'old' templating system let both worlds work  
> together, and use graphic's work immediately.
>
> extbase focuses on a unique model: the one-man-band webmaster,  
> forgetting completely about cooperation between different stages od  
> development (like graphics and coding).
>
> Regards,
>
> Tonino
>
>

Cheerful,
Patrick Schriner