[TYPO3-english] Extensions potentially violating the GPL

[Tonix (Antonio Nati)]

If you develop an important extension at your cost, and you have to 
"live" with your work, or you keep all the work for you, or you just 
publish a (complete or reduced) version in compiled state.
If extension is well documented and complies all TYPO3 programming 
rules, why not including it in TER?

Tonino

Il 16/12/2010 10:26, Ivano Luberti ha scritto:
> Why you would do that?
>
> Il 16/12/2010 10.17, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto:
>> So, it is possible or not to upload extensions which contain
>> "compiled" (i..e. not source) code?
>>
>> Tonino
>>
>> Il 16/12/2010 10:09, Dmitry Dulepov ha scritto:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Kay Strobach wrote:
>>>> based on the discussion which has been done on the german list about
>>>> non
>>>> GPL extensions there is new article in the wiki to collect those
>>>> extensions:
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.typo3.org/Overview_Extension_manuals#Non-GPL_compatible_extensions_.28to_be_removed_from_TER.29
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Based on the terms of use for the TER these extensions could be removed
>>>> without further notice - but that's not what we want as a result, we
>>>> just want to keep the TER clean and found a solution to solve that
>>>> problem and protect all users of TYPO3 of licensing problems.
>>> May be it is better to change TER rules?
>>>
>>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
         Inter at zioni            Interazioni di Antonio Nati
    http://www.interazioni.it      tonix at interazioni.it
------------------------------------------------------------