[TYPO3-english] SPEED comparison of JS Frameworks

[ries van Twisk]

On Oct 22, 2008, at 3:54 AM, T.M.Snyder wrote:

>
>>
>> The fastest one (in FF2) is Peppy 0.1 beta, but it is limited to  
>> being a
>> DOM selector engine...
>
> I wasn't pointing out peppy.
> I found the site cool because of comparison of time used by  
> frameworks.
>
> And compared prototype to jquery, prototype is poor.
> It consumes 4x more time than jQuery.

Forgot to ask you, what browser/OS did you found that prototype was 4  
times slower then JQuery?
I tested it both in safari and FF and found that there is a 1.5 time  
speed different between JQuery and Prototype,
however all tests in FF did run 3 times slower then in safari.

Ries

>
>
> And for an *Enterprise* CMS I don't think its good to use frameworks  
> who are
> slow and is much tooo big.
> Which means it takes too much time to load the code and then plus,  
> it takes
> up to 4 times more time to execute code....
> These negative things you don't have with e.g. jQuery or other  
> frameworks.
>
> Thats what I wanted to say...
>
>>
>> -- 
>> Jigal van Hemert.
>>
>








			regards, Ries van Twisk


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?