[TYPO3] pagetitle and tt_news

[Dieter Jansen]

Hi Francois,

Thanks for your reaction, and I allready read the linked article.
But if I put this, like you suggested :

lib.desc = COA
lib.desc {
	5 = TEXT
	5.value = <h1>
	10 = TEXT
	10.value = {$title}:
	10.wrap = <span class="desc"> | </span>
	20 = TEXT
	20.value = &nbsp;{field:subtitle // TSFE:page|title}
	20.insertData = 1
	25 = TEXT
	25.value = </h1>
	}

It does not display the title of the tt_news article, but the pagetitle 
of the page where the single display of tt_news is on.

So I use an exception for that page and use Guido's part

20=RECORDS
     20 {
		source = {GPvar:tx_ttnews|tt_news}
		source.insertData = 1
		tables = tt_news
		conf.tt_news >
		conf.tt_news = TEXT
		conf.tt_news.field=title
		}

And according to the Typoscript Object Browser [substitutePagetitle]=1 
is allready set default. So no need to set it manually in TS again?

However on older sites (older version of tt_news, same version of TYPO3, 
4.16) this allways was enough for showing the tt_news title :

20.value = &nbsp;{page|title}

grts

> Hi Dieter,
> 
>> It seems that the easiest way to get the sitename and title in the 
>> pagetitle is how Dmitry Martyenko described it, just fill in the 
>> "domain name" to "Website title" field in root template. No TS needed 
>> and it works for tt_news.
> 
> It may be the easiest, but the way you did it opens the door to far more 
> variants, which are better for referencing. You may want to take a look 
> at that article:
> 
> http://www.dawsoninteractive.com/articles/article/typo3-seo-introduction/
> 
>> Thanks Guido for your usefull tip, especially the TS to get the 
>> tt_news title of an article. I use it now to automatically generate an 
>> H1.
> 
> That may be useful in a case other than tt_news, but when using:
> 
> plugin.tt_news {
>   substitutePagetitle = 1
> }
> 
> 
> the title of the news is loaded in $GLOBALS['TSFE']->page['title'] which 
> you can retrieve by TS as shown in my example:
> 
> ...data = TSFE:page|title
> 
> Guido's method is correct and useful, but queries the database which is 
> unnecessary in this case.
> 
> Cheers
>