[TYPO3-english] got "no_cache=1" twice
ries van Twisk
typo3 at rvt.dds.nl
Tue Dec 30 16:59:57 CET 2008
On Dec 30, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Dmitry Dulepov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> piet roorda wrote:
>> and if he states he has a problem with typo3 he spoils the name of
>> typo3,and
>> if he complains about his dinner his wife will angry,
>
> "Problem with TYPO3" means problem on TYPO3 side. "Problem in my
> configuration" or "problem with my URLs" means something different,
> don't you see? It comes to one thing: who is accused of the problem.
This user might not know how to express the problem in english well
(he is not native english I think) and you could see that from his use
of wording,
please consider this when reading mails of other users.
>
>
>> Maybe it is an idea to approach people in a more friendly way,
>> Dimitry
>
> I did not say anything unfriendly. I only commented on the problem
> report. He could also say that he has problem with typolink or
> tslib_cObj, which is equally incorrect.
>
> People should be more careful in what we say. Sometimes I feel that
> US people are correct when they have to think a lot of what they say
> because otherwise they can be sued for their words. I neither want
> to sue anyone, nor I think it is appropriate in most cases. But such
> non–careful claims spoil the reputation of good extensions. Look at
> it from the perspective of someone who found that entry using
> Google. What they will think? Only one thing: "RealURL gives
> problems". Is this fare? Not at all.
The number of people giving good reports about RealUrl outweighs the
number of people with bad reports, so you not worry about that! (can I
say worry?? I don't want to start a flame here...)
Happy holidays and season greetings,
Ries
More information about the TYPO3-english
mailing list