[TYPO3] Is DAM worth its use or is it dead?

[Benjamin Mack]

Hey Ben,

ben van 't ende [netcreators] wrote:
> Erik Svendsen wrote:
> DAM is absolutely an essential part of an Enterprise CMS. We implement 
> it on a lot of sites already in combination with mm_filelist that really 
> is a superb extension for showing records from DAM. A lot has improved 
> towards 1.1. Netcreators also has some projects now where we can develop 
> DAM a little further and work towards a 1.1 final. I am making a list of 
> that now. I have seen some interesting remarks in this thread. Two 
> things are indeed skinning and customizing the backend forms to make it 
> a little more userfriendly. We'll consider that after 1.1. I have to 
> laugh a bit about the remark that it is barely usable. Usability can be 
> improved, but Rene did a great job building DAM as it is.
Yes. I sit next to a guy in my office who has to use the DAM very often. 
"Oh, why can't it be simpler like this and that?" That's probably the 
main reason why I joined the DAM development, so the crying in my office 
will finally stop :)

-- 
greetings,
benni.
-SDG-