[TYPO3] No tutorials?

[Tyler Kraft]

Just out of curiosity - what's wrong with TSref as it is. (I mean its 
supposed to be a reference document, and not an instruction manual.)

I mean some parts of the explanations could be improved a bit, but 
format I think is fine. IMHO what is lacking is a small section of how 
to use the manual (not the information within) and how to cross 
reference between parts of it.

I would also like to see a new and improved version typoscript by 
example - one that should become a TSref2 type document that has lots of 
examples that correspond to TSref - but again this should not be in 
TSref. I don't want to have any more un-necessary things in TSref when 
I'm looking for things that I already understand and I just want to 
double check something.





mario wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 01:43 +0200, JoH wrote:
>>> TYPO3 should be mainstream for lots of reasons. Mainstream meaning the
>>> .........
>> At least here in Germany TYPO3 is on it's way to become this market leader
>> even though most of the documentation is written in english and thus even
>> less understandable than for a native speaker..
> 
> This comment reminds me that not so seldom I happen to run into German
> material (magazine article, forums, ...), which I am not really able to
> read. Is  it good for a strong world wide Typo3 community?
> 
> On the main topic of this thread, I think that Typo3 needs to find its
> science-made-easy kind of writer, somebody which could write a complete
> Typo3-`bible´ from scratch (with a different style from Kasper`s). 
> 
> Something I see on the top list: it would help to get a small group of
> people to rewrite TSref, included at least a professional technical
> writer who is a native (good) english speaker.  
> 
> Indeed, Typo3 deserves a better documentation.  :-)
> mario
>