[TYPO3-dev] The future of Bug Days

[Kay Strobach]

Hi,

as there are many local usergroups, wouldn't it be a solution to make
one bugday into many small local events.

This way contributors can meet locally and build a real local social
network. If there bug days / meetings locally e.g. every 6th. thursday
evening there can also be a centralised frame programm which is
moderated. Something similar has been done with the 4.5 release parties
- or not?

Otherwise i like the big blue idea.

@Forums:
Not ready yet but 99% working and in sync with MLs ...:
http://forumdev.typo3.org/

Regards
Kay



Am 25.07.2011 10:29, schrieb Georg Ringer:
> Am 25.07.2011 10:03, schrieb Jigal van Hemert:
>> If you are not a command line person you are basically left on your own.
> 
> i am not a command line person as there is little to do on command line
> but I took the chance to improve there my knowledge (you always need
> command line on your unix servers...)
> 
>> A decent news reader such as Thunderbird (but others will probably have
>> comparable features) has the option to attach categories (tags) to
>> messages or threads. With a single click you can filter these. In a
>> thread with the tag ("reviewed by reading and testing") a new message
>> would emerge with another positive vote and I would simply mark it
>> ("need to commit").
> 
> so you spent many hours and months of knowledge to get there as well.
> 
>> Okay, not technically advanced, automated, etc., but it worked very
>> well. I could easily find patches I needed to review or commit.
> 
> if someone new wanted to use the mailinglists, 1st thing was "oh mailing
> lists, so old, why not use a forum...:" ;)
> 
> I love mailinglists but still: don't forget how long you needed to have
> a perfect environment there.
> 
>> In Gerrit I find it very hard to find change set which I have or have
>> not reviewed yet, especially when a new version was pushed.
> 
> settings > preferences > Display Person Name In Review Categor
> 
>>> revitalize for discussing would be nice. so for each review a new thread
>>> starts but IMO nobodoy got the extra time to get patches svn style into
>>> gerrit.
>>
>> And if it would mean that reviewing activity would increase a lot? Would
>> that justify the extra time?
> 
> git is your version control. mailing lists for discussions. A bridge
> would be good but IMO it is not good to change version control to svn
> style.
> 
> Georg


-- 
http://www.kay-strobach.de - Open Source Rocks

TYPO3 .... inspiring people to share!
Get involved: http://typo3.org