[TYPO3-dev] General Question on extbase
Dmitry Dulepov
dmitry.dulepov+t3ml at gmail.com
Tue Feb 2 15:36:10 CET 2010
Hi!
On 2010-02-02 16:02:01 +0200, Peter Russ said:
> As Flow "has undergone some heavy refactoring" and "a few hundred class
> names have been renamed to enforce more consistent naming conventions"
> are there any side effects on current extbase development or extensions
> started on extbase?
>
> If so does it makes sense to develop on extbase as there might be more
> of these brakes.
>
> Your ideas are welcome.
As a core dev I should say: yes, use it, it is our future!
As a regular daily PHP programmer, I would say that it is too early to
do anything serious with Extbase/Fluid/FLOW3. While Extbase/Fluid
appeared in the 4.x core, I neither saw any performance tests, nor I
saw official docs or up–to–date tutorials. This tells me that these two
extension are not serious yet. So I would not use them in production.
Even official blogExample fails in various points in its each version
(including current). The whole thing does not feel like a finished,
polished and ready to use product.
I appologize for developers of this extensions if it hurts them to read
the above paragraph.
As to FLOW3, it is still a big sport game from the "let's make it more
perfect" series. After all these years it is not a serious player yet.
Sometimes I wonder what will be out first: Zend Framework 2.0 or FLOW3.
ZF2.0 is going to have all goodies of FLOW3 and more and it is backed
up by Zend...
All of the above is my personal views and they are not necessarily
correct. I do not want to argue about them but I will carefully read
any other people may say about Extbase/Fluid/FLOW3. I am interested in
this topic too.
--
Dmitry Dulepov
TYPO3 expert / TYPO3 core team member / TYPO3 security team member
Read more @ http://dmitry-dulepov.com/
More information about the TYPO3-dev
mailing list