[TYPO3-dev] to eID or not to eID?
Dmitry Dulepov
dmitry at typo3.org
Tue Aug 10 09:41:41 CEST 2010
Hi!
Lina Wolf wrote:
> As far as I understand the eID was developed to create quicker response, for
> example in surrounding of Ajax. The advantage of the eID would be that a lot
> of things that are usually initialised don't need to be in case of using
> eID.
This is one of cases, yes.
> But if I do need the full program in my Ajax response: typolinks, therefore
> a cObject, Typoscript, therefore the whole TypoScript building process,
> localised strings, therfore...
>
> Is there still a real advantage in using eID then? Is there any advantage in
> using the alternative (witch would be page types?)
Yes, there are several advantages:
- you do not need a dedicated page type, so you have less TS and less
hidden knowledge in your installation
- even if you initialize TS in eID, it will be faster than initializinf the
full FE environment
> Would you suggest to use eID in pingback responses, XML-RPC and other
> not-Ajax maschine to maschine communication? Should XML's like RSS-Feeds or
> FOAF-XML be page types or eID?
Yes.
If you are interested in more details about how to program eID, you can get
my book: http://www.packtpub.com/typo3-extension-development/book The book
does not cover Extbase but it covers almost everything else you need to
know about TYPO3 extension development.
--
Dmitry Dulepov
TYPO3 core&security team member
Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitryd
Read more @ http://dmitry-dulepov.com/
More information about the TYPO3-dev
mailing list