[TYPO3-dev] blog_example gives error "A cache with identifier "cache_extbase_reflection" does not exist"

Thomas "Thasmo" Deinhamer thasmo at gmail.com
Thu Apr 22 16:56:58 CEST 2010


Regarding the performance, have a look here:
http://flow3.typo3.org/download/release-notes/100-alpha-8/

Thomas

Am 22.04.2010 14:31, schrieb Chris Zepernick {SwiftLizard}:
> Guys,
>
>> you have already been posting that request to MVC list. It's more easier
>> to keep track of that issue when it is discussed in one thread/list.
>
> yes you are right Steffen, but ...
>
>> Please stick to the rules. Thanks.
>
>
> I think it is a totally normal reaction for a new player to ask in a
> different list if I get no answer in the "right" list, a "stick to the
> rules" helps no one. Provide an answer at least in one of the lists and
> point to it instead of pointing to the rules and leaving the problem
> unsolved.
>
>
> The other point is that this thread shows how fatal our communication
> of the on going development to the outside world has become in the last
> years. Yes there is a development of version 5, the code is cool stuff
> and a dream form the software architects point of view. No questioning
> that. But let us please be honest ... Flow has some huge performance
> flaws that have to be managed before we can call it a release to work with.
>
> It is still alpha, and from my point current of view (please proof me
> wrong) it will not be a competitor for the other frameworks out there
> for at least two years, perhaps longer. Lately I saw performance tests
> where it was over 60 times slower then Zend or Symfony. And no hardware
> is not the answer to that problem.
>
> But let me come to ExtBase and Fluid, both are backports from Flow witch
> is still under development, so they are as well. Here as well
> the concept is nice, at least from the developer point of view, but
> neither nor should be used for production at the moment because the core
> parts may change dramaticly because of changes at Flow.
>
> The other side of the Story here as well is performance, and handling
> for non BE - Devs, ever tried to explain the pure html css guy what
> namespaces and iterations are ? Fluid is a nice and cool templating and
> from the devs point of view I love it, but I love my strict seperation
> of logic and view even more, with fluid we start mixing that again.
> Least because the templates have to be parsed with regex completly for
> tags, viewhelpers and other stuff like ns declarations, for pages that
> can not be cached for any reason you will be f.... .
>
> Point is, please let us start to communicate resonable, and start to
> learn from previous faults in communication. It is not "Extbase & Fluid
> are the future you should use them now to keep your extensions ready for
> Flow", it is "Extbase & Fluid will be the next gerneration of Ext
> Development, keep an eye on the development, but we are still at
> development at it is not stable and not recommended for use in
> production". We allready made this faults with workspaces, irre, dam,
> and tv in the last years. Each was communicated as the big new feature
> witch will work perfectly fine. None of them did right away although the
> basic concepts all where cool stuff.
>
>
> Btw. to the core devs, thanks guys for the great work, I really do
> appreciate the time and energy all of you contributed.
>
>
> cheers
>
> chris




More information about the TYPO3-dev mailing list