[TYPO3-dev] Fully Blown StdWrap - Check it out!

[dan frost]

i just replied to this, but thunderbird went stupid.

point was: architecture of obts is right. But: TS
is a bad architecture without massive review.
You're just digging you're self into a hole!

dan


JoH wrote:
>>> BTW: fullStdWrap = 1 is only necessary to keep backwards
>>> compatibility. If you don't set it, the original stdWrap is used.
>>> Maybe this could be a parameter for the install tool in the final
>>> version.
>> what is the difference between this and objecttyposcript? ObTS?
> 
> I can't tell you exactly but these are some of the known differences at the
> moment:
> 
> 1. less code (about 30K only)
> 2. less complicated (no additional things like "_attributes")
>     You can do things like
> 
>       value = a value
>       wrap = left | {gpvar : right}
>       wrap.insertData = 1
> 
>     instead of
> 
>       value = a value
>       wrap = left | {gpvar : right}
>       _attributes.wrap = 1
>       wrap.insertdata = 1
> 
> 3. camelCase still possible
> 4. stdWrap only no additional functionality needed
> 5. no additional Datatypes yet, since I just wanted to improve stdWrap
> 
> You might find more by checking out the extension code.
> 
> Joey
>