[TYPO3-dev] The neverending sf story
Michael Scharkow
michael at underused.org
Sat Mar 11 23:44:04 CET 2006
Dimitri Tarassenko wrote:
> TYPO3 does not use SF almost at all. Bugtacker is separate, file
> release system is used only for the core (compare to jEdit using FRS
> to distribute their plugins).
>
> So, in terms of switching - yeah, it's easy to move elsewhere because
> all that needs to be moved is the CVS tree. I really doubt any of
> these three would have better availability than SF. It would be a
> trade of _hopes_ of better availability for smaller number of people
> who have developer accounts in the system.
>
> What really would be an improvement is something like Trac
> http://www.edgewall.com/trac/ - something that had more project
> management, matching bugs to CVS/SVN commits, documentation - even if
> that would mean a commercial platform.
Hi Dimitri and Sven,
you should really read the core list ;) We discussed just the above and
some people (including me) like to use svn and trac for TYPO3
development, for exactly the reasons you mention above.
The only issues are:
1. We need some people to manage the repos and trac (Karsten, Peter and
I have volunteered for this)
2. We need a server and bandwith (which probably is not too costly)
3. We need to import stuff, test and make things happen
I can only help with 1 and 3, but if someone provides 2, we can have a
working test setup by the end of next week, promise.
Cheerio,
Michael
More information about the TYPO3-dev
mailing list