[TYPO3-dev] captcha

[Steffen Kamper]

"Zorik" <zorik2005 at zorik.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:mailman.1.1166111961.32633.typo3-dev at lists.netfielders.de...
>
>> Who blames technology? I said that spammers are equals to terrorists.
>> Both do their business in a way that seriously disturbs other people.
>
> captcha - clear intention is to prevent any automated software (good or 
> bad)
> from entering the site or submitting the form. I call this "blaming a
> technology".
> I am angry on spammers, very angry, for creating this situation. Because I
> agree, most automated activity on the net is done by spammers.
>
it's the decision of webmaster himself for whom he open his site.
I'm not interested that bots use my forms - anyway bad or good.
On sites there are a lot of informations in the texts, thats enough for any 
bot. This forms sending mails to me and
i hate wasting time to delete these generated mails ...

>
>
>>> But if you do agree to accept messages from any source from world wide
>>> web from any country, person, automated or human, etc. - HANDLE THE
>>> OUTCOME! Nothing to complain about.
>>
>> I agree to receive messages from anyone. However I do not agree to
>> accept advertisement messages. But I still get them. So I hate spammers
>> who send those messages. This is not a question from who I receive but
>> what I receive. Spammers do not let me choose, they limit my freedom.
>
> This is exactly the issue I am trying to address -
> The user should receive information HE requests, and not to be "fed" by
> information provided.
> This is the difference between internet and television. This is the
> difference between internet as we know and harvesting for information we
> really need.
>
> As for "advertisement". If I invite you to a coffee - it is 
> advertisement -
> I advertize myself, or coffee, or it is a "pre-sale" of what I am going to
> say to you over coffee. And it is not necessarily harmful to you. Or
> annoying.
> So, I do not think filtering messages by content is an effective 
> technique.
>
> On the other hand, if my coffee invitation has annoyed you in any way - 
> you
> should be able to avoid communication with me. This is why you need to
> clearly identify me in the first place.
>
i never get offers for coffee - i would buy, promise :-)
the only offers are viagra and other stuff - i never would buy, promised 
too!

>>
>> For example KLM sends me their f*cking "Flying blue" messages every
>> month even I tried to unsubscribe several times. Spammers. I will never
>> fly with KLM again!
>
*gg*

vg  Steffen

> "I tried to unsubscribe several times" - this is clearly illegal. "KLM" - 
> is
> known and established company. I believe you can easily sue them for
> annoying.
>
>
> -- 
> Zorik