[Typo3-dev] $GLOBALS["TSFE"]->set_no_cache() vs USER_INT
Dominic Brander
typo3_db at snowflake.ch
Tue Sep 9 11:56:50 CEST 2003
thanks to all for your answers. I think I got the point more or less.
have a nice week!
dominic
Robert Lemke wrote:
> Kurt Dirnbauer | web:consulting wrote:
>
>
>>so, this should be done if the output of the extension
>>and the included links should be cached:
>>- use "USER", not "USER_INT"
>
>
> that depends, of course. If you have dynamic content, use USER_INT
> (see my other post)
>
>
>>- dont't use "set_no_cache", because then the whole page (including
>>the output of the extension - of course - is not cached).
>
>
> If you want it to be cached, yes.
>
>
>>- to inlcude files (especially doc, pdf):
>> . the required binaries have to be installed
>> . the links in the output of the extension have to
>> be included like in your tut.
>
>
> ?
>
>
>>-> what happens if i change an already cached record (in the backend)?
>
>
>>b) the cached stuff gets updated, and is reachable by indexed search.
>> (thats what i wish. :-))
>
>
--
dominic brander
________________________________________________________________________
dominic brander - snowflake productions gmbh
tel. CH +41 1 451 75 71 - fax. CH +41 1 451 63 80
tel. D +49 89 31 56 78 15 - fax. D +49 89 31 56 78 16
mobile +41 76 493 25 88
http://www.snowflake.ch
More information about the TYPO3-dev
mailing list