[Typo3-t3board03] Extension Review Weekend
Robert Lemke
robert at typo3.org
Mon Jan 10 17:36:15 CET 2005
On Monday 10 January 2005 14:38, Juergen Egeling wrote:
> One short question on this, which might have been answered:
> Did someone look thru any statistics how long we could organize the
> review in this way? Like: If we have a doubleing of EXT every
> year, and we need 20 participants for review, we will need 40
> next year, 80 in 2007, 160 in 2008 and you soon get the idea when
> it won't work any more.
Yes, I hava taken that into account.
> My idea was, that every user could judge an EXT like checking some easy
> to ask for things:
> documentation: fit along, outdated, to complicated, etc. ...
> stability: crashes often, sometimes crashes, never crashed
> tested with TYPO3 version: 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, ...
> job: does the job, too specific, could be done in TYPO3 directly
> etc. etc. etc. you all know it better than I do. So if the questionaire
> is short enough everyone could fill it in I think.
> Somehow people should know that their vote is not anonymous, so that
> noone could spoil a competitors EXT, etc.
> but I think a judging system like eBay or similar things helps to
> get along with the workload.
exactly. Also some compability matrixes would be nice.
> If we have than an order, we than could start from the top down,
> to analyse the code if the EXT, and maybe stick some out like:
> programmers if you want to learn from EXT, look at those:...
That's what we have the reviewing workflow for, but I guess we'll extend and
finetune that in the future.
--
Robert Lemke
Assessor
TYPO3 Association
http://association.typo3.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.netfielders.de/pipermail/t3board/attachments/20050110/a7e19cbc/attachment.pgp
More information about the T3board
mailing list