[TYPO3-50-general] Adding PHPCR to NEOS

Christian Müller christian.mueller at typo3.org
Tue Oct 9 17:45:32 CEST 2012


Hi all,

I am also interested in this topic as well.

Chris, you mean 
http://docs.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-phpcr-odm/en/latest/ 
right?

Yes I think that would be it basically, just that you have to see how 
that works with our idea of workspaces. I think that is the biggest 
challenge.

Cheers,
Christian

On 09/10/12 16:42, Chris Zepernick wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> will check on the weekend and get back to you during the next week.
>
> As Far as I can see it at the moment only the TYPOP3CR would need to 
> be replaced with DOCTRINE.ODM, right?
>
> cheers
>
> Chris
>
> On 2012-10-09 13:01:11 +0000, Robert Lemke said:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On 09.10.2012, at 14:39, Chris Zepernick (SwiftLizard) 
>> <chris at swift-lizard.com> wrote:
>>
>>> just started the discussion on Twitter about this topic.
>>> Basicly it might make sense to drop TYPO3CR for PHPCR and parts of 
>>> symfony2-CMF, especially now that TYPO3 Flow is composer compatible.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>> Pros and Cons please,..
>>
>>
>> my position (in short and in general):
>>
>> - great if we can use phpcr
>> - doesn't have top priority for the core team because first we should 
>> concentrate on getting 1.0 out of the door
>> - we support anyone taking initiative on this matter (well, you … ;-)
>> - implementation must have roughly the same feature set we have now, 
>> most importantly: personal workspaces with copy-on-write
>> - we must always be able to provide a PHP-only implementation with at 
>> least the current feature set
>> - Jackrabbit (or Oak) must, if used, be drop in replacements for the 
>> key feature set we declare for Neos
>>
>> So, what we'd need is a plan for what needs to be done and what 
>> implications it has for our current codebase.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Robert
>
>





More information about the TYPO3-project-5_0-general mailing list