[TYPO3-50-general] RFC: Improved Shorthand Syntax

[Martin Kutschker]

Falk Kühnel schrieb:
> As Jochen said, " --> " could be nice aswell, but why use an additional
> charater for the "shorthand" syntax :)
> 
> 
>> Yes, I forgot "and". Makes even less sense to me if you read it like
>> that.
>>   
> 
> Only to conclude this little excursion (since i dont prefer this version
> either), you should just read the line:
> "Take the title and crop it and trim it and do whatever with it. "
> Sounds very reasonable to me.

Ah, pseudo-English like in SQL. But in this case I would use a literal "and" and not a plus sign.

Masi