[TYPO3-50-general] RFC: Improved Shorthand Syntax
masi-no at spam-typo3.org
Wed Oct 21 15:02:10 CEST 2009
Falk Kühnel schrieb:
> As Jochen said, " --> " could be nice aswell, but why use an additional
> charater for the "shorthand" syntax :)
>> Yes, I forgot "and". Makes even less sense to me if you read it like
> Only to conclude this little excursion (since i dont prefer this version
> either), you should just read the line:
> "Take the title and crop it and trim it and do whatever with it. "
> Sounds very reasonable to me.
Ah, pseudo-English like in SQL. But in this case I would use a literal "and" and not a plus sign.
More information about the TYPO3-project-5_0-general