[TYPO3-50-general] Rebuilding Backend GUI

[ries van Twisk]

On Mar 19, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Martin Kutschker wrote:

> ries van Twisk schrieb:
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Martin Kutschker wrote:
>>
>>> ries van Twisk schrieb:
>>>>
>>>> "The problem with frameworks is that they are perfectly  
>>>> understandable
>>>> by it's creators... But hard to understand by the people that  
>>>> want to
>>>> use them"
>>>>
>>>> it's better to create components.....
>>>
>>> So you think that FLOW3 is a failure by design?
>>>
>>> Masi
>>
>> I cannot judge if FLOW3 is a failure by design since I never  
>> checked out
>> the projects, but from what I read and hear it's not.
>
> You wrote that ANY framework is a failure, just because framewroks  
> are bad
> idea ;-)
>
> Masi

I didn't say per-see that any framework is a failure....

The usage of framework and component implementation is often intermixed.
It could just well be that FLOW3 is called a framework, but has a high  
degree
of component implementation, which is good.

ries.

PS: I still like to see a Adobe FLEX BE rather then a JS be, what do  
you think of this??