[TYPO3-50-general] TypoScript 2.0 EBNF
gawain at camlann.de
Tue Jun 12 09:24:37 CEST 2007
Robert Lemke wrote:
> Yes, you're right. However, I decided to not program a lexer because
> starting with it I realized it would only complicate things if we worked
> with tokens and even tokenize ourselves. Instead of writing my own
> FSM 
> I just used regular expressions.
I do not think, that it complicates things. It even simplifies them.
There are three big advanteges for using a lexer in a compiler
(additionally to the better readability agains regexps):
1) you can implement the ebnf really straight forward if you
have not to hassle with pattern matching in the parser.
2) a lexer+parser combo is faster than regexps.
3) things like
blabla.value = "text 'text'"
blabla.value ='small \'text'
are handled by the lexer. you dont have to deal with it in the
MfG, Christian Welzel
Fingerprint: 4F50 19BF 3346 36A6 CFA9 DBDC C268 6D24 70A1 AD15
More information about the TYPO3-project-5_0-general