[Flow] RFC: Drop CLA for Flow and Neos
Jigal van Hemert
jigal.van.hemert at typo3.org
Tue Jul 15 21:14:38 CEST 2014
Hi,
On 14-7-2014 23:17, Helmut Hummel wrote:
> 1. Do we think *now* that a copyleft licence (e.g. GPL) is good for the
> project to prosper? If so, keep it and drop the CLA. If not, change it
> to a more permissive licence (e.g. MIT) *now* and drop the CLA.
>
> 2. Changing the licence at a later point (if we think it helps for the
> porject to prosper) without a CLA may be harder, but it is not
> impossible. We could even switch from our CLA to a FLA like e.g KDE[2]
> which is *optional* to sign and not *mandatory*
I wouldn't mind if we would have a Public Domain (or EUPD) license.
Personally I like the name of the WTFPL, but it isn't recognized by all
license experts organisations :-)
The CLA wasn't too hard for me with a 4-in-1 in the house, but I can
imagine that some people don't like the effort.
--
Jigal van Hemert
TYPO3 CMS Active Contributor
TYPO3 .... inspiring people to share!
Get involved: typo3.org
More information about the Flow
mailing list