[FLOW3-general] Your feedback – what's missing for FLOW3 1.0 beta?

[Nicolas Forgerit]

Hey Tolleiv,

i cannot see why naming the software a Beta would hinder the people to
go with the flow (pun intended; nice song btw), though, asking the
people for feedback now seems a bit bad timed. (For me, too. I
actually cannot give great feedback cause i somewhat lost the right
point of view. But, however, we should trust that the guys know what
they're doing, particularly because there is a bigger project (the
already mentioned conference site) that proved that it's all working.
However, i think being beta would rather encourage new developers to
jump on the train instead of snubbing the current developers.)

Finally, phasing into a beta stage becomes essential for not getting a
vaporware award. :)

Ciao
  Nico

PS: I guess i somewhere picked up a release time around mid-June, but
i'm not sure cause i cannot find the source anymore.


On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Tolleiv Nietsch <info at tolleiv.de> wrote:
>
> I just wanted to bring up concerns, because imho people haven't been able to
> work with FLOW3 "undisturbed" in the last weeks. They had no chance to
> consolidate their own knowledge of FLOW3 (with Doctrine2,...). And thus
> asking for "final features" and kicking out that beta is imho just too
> early. Therefore it seems to me that it's just some stupid politics (why?)
> which cause this beta release - that's why I said that having it prooves
> nothing.
>
> But anyway, didn't want to start a flamewar and I'd still like to know what
> the schedule for the beta is?
>
> Cheers,
> Tolleiv
>