[FLOW3-general] Some thoughts about settings & inherited classes
Manuel Strausz
tminus at bitmap.co.at
Mon Jan 4 13:53:03 CET 2010
Sebastian Kurfürst schrieb:
> Hey Manuel,
>
> just a quick note: From my understanding, it would not make sense to
> have a _global_ setting which says "Use XXX instead of Fluid", because
> if you have multiple Packages, some might depend on Fluid.
> So, maybe this setting should be per package?
>
> Greets,
> Sebastian
I guess that makes sense, yes. My motivation for making it a global
setting was that for certain projects, I might have to use a different
template engine for all packages within. So I would like to be able to
switch out the "default" view class used by setting this in the working
dir configuration.
Then again it does make sense to keep the default on Fluid - since
that's what the framework packages and most 3rd party packages will rely on.
I'll just have to introduce the package specific setting in each package
that might use a different view.
Just was curious if 'inherited' settings made any sense at all.
The FLOW3 setting configuration is already pretty interesting with it's
layered architecture, I'm really happy how flexible it makes us in
making things interchangable.
Thanks for the advice ;)
Greetings,
Manuel
More information about the FLOW3-general
mailing list