[TYPO3-ect] Voting: Classnames for BETA

[Michael Stucki]

Hi Elmar,

> now everybody had enough time to contribute his suggestions for the
> namings of BETA. I digested all suggestions and did a few tests with the
> extension manager. Now I ask you to vote for your favoured one of three
> alternatives.

Ingo asked me to have a look on this discussion.

Well, I have to admit that I have no idea what this is all about. Are just
discussing the naming of a single extension? Or is it a request to change
the coding guidelines? Just give me a pointer, please!

>  [ ] ext/Rock/T3P_Rock_HardRock.php        (Gimme five)

Every 4.x extension will require a full rewrite for 5.0 compatibility, so
why should it pretend the opposite?

>  [ ] ext/Rock/tx_Rock_HardRock.php         (Robert)
>  [ ] ext/rock/tx_rock_hardrock.php         (Robert #2)

It may remove redundancy (consider Roberts comment about using lower-case
which I agree with him). But given by the fact that the naming scheme will
change for 5.0 again, I see no practical use in this change.

>  [ ] ext/rock/class.tx_rock_hardrock.php   (Ingo)

If the class/file name must identify that this is an MVC based class, then
go ahead and change the name. However, if this identification is not needed
(and I think so) then I think you should just stick to this option.

- michael
-- 
Use a newsreader! Check out
http://typo3.org/community/mailing-lists/use-a-news-reader/