[TYPO3-dam-devel] Release TYPO3 4.2 and DAM 1.1

[Peter Kuehn [wmdb]]

Hi Stucki,

 >> - i published a version of dam with dam_index integrated and the sv_*
 >> exts on this list
 > Where can I find this mail?

see
[TYPO3-dam-devel] DAM 1.1 structure: dam_index integrated, 30.12.2007 18:09
and
[TYPO3-dam-devel] new sv_* exts, 29.12.2007 18:03

cheers

Michael Stucki schrieb:
> Hi Peter,
> 
>> im not shure bout the actual status either cause i dont know any russian
>> and it seems like there have been some sort of a hostile acquisition of
>> this list ;)
> 
> Right. The reason is that currently, only team-members can read the list,
> however everybody can post to this list to get in touch with us. And then
> the address somehow went public, and was found by some spammers.
> 
> Anyway, if nobody objects I suggest we just close this feature, so only
> subscribed members can post again. Other users can still post to the
> typo3-project-dam list AFTER they have subscribed there.
> 
>> first of all: i totaly agree on publishing both projects together. im
>> shure thats the best way to go.
> 
> Great!
> 
>> - looking at PR#3 - which needs an update - i assume that there are less
>> then 10 bugs that need some coding. i volunteer for this if we can agree
>> on a little more prompt testing and response.
> 
> I will test if it is necessary. Still hope that others come first...
> 
>> - i published a version of dam with dam_index integrated and the sv_*
>> exts on this list as discussed. other than michiel im still convinced
>> that we could and should use this as the basis for the upcoming release.
>> please vote.
> 
> Where can I find this mail?
> 
>> - ben is now head of documentation which is great :D
>> - sponsoring is allways welcome, but i think we should make a plan that
>> works without rather than rely on hireing hands.
> 
> I think before looking for sponsors, people need to realize that DAM is
> alive, and that things have changed now. Lately it was a dead rock, so
> nobody would have invested any money in it.
> 
>> ill compile a PR#4 this evening and then: lets go!
> 
> Great!
> 
> - michael