[TYPO3-content-rendering] mailform

[Martin Kutschker]

"Michael Scharkow" <mscharkow at gmx.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:mailman.1.1116863963.31862.typo3-project-content-rendering at lists.netfielders.de...
> Martin Kutschker wrote:
>
>> Yes, I mean accessible forms by default would be great. But no, *sigh* 
>> because of Stucki tied originally xhtml-comformance to the accessibilty 
>> flag. But I seem to have convonced him that xhtml-conformance should come 
>> out of the box.
>
> I agree. I don't understand the purpose of the accessibility flag anyway. 
> Why should anyone *not* want accessibility features? Backwards 
> compatibility sucks when old version sucked as well ;)

Especially as I don't see why the additional label tag would have broken any 
old site.

Masi