[TYPO3-project-4-3] 4.3.0 vs. 4.2.7

[Dan Osipov]

BTW, it makes sense that a lot of PHP time is spent in the autoloader. 
If you profile 4.2, you will find that require and require_once calls 
take a long time as well.

Dan Osipov
Calkins Media
http://danosipov.com/blog/

Rupert Germann wrote:
> hi again,
> 
> Ingmar Schlecht wrote:
>> As an additonal scenario I think it would also be interesting to see
>> performance results of the trunk revision before autoloading and after...
> 
> I have already an idea how this results would look like.... :-/
> 
> I think sooner or later the most of you will accepts the results of this
> tests. 
> But what are the consequences? 
> 
> No customer will be interested in a new TYPO3 version which is 25% slower
> than the former version. OK, we can say that 4.3 offers cool new features
> like the possibility to choose different caching backends for each cache
> table.
> But honestly, I doubt that the majority of the TYPO3 users/admins will
> benefit from this. Their focus will be the performance.
> (and btw: I did also some tests with 4.3 using apc, memcached... 
> -> the db-backend was always the fastest and it was always slower than
> 4.2.7)
> 
> So. How do we solve this?
> Ideas please.
> 
> 
> greets
> rupert