[TYPO3-project-4-3] FYI: patch for autoloader is in the BT

[Martin Kutschker]

Dmitry Dulepov schrieb:
> Hi!
> 
> Martin Kutschker wrote:
>> I think this should at least make clear why you should not implement
>> t3lib_Singleton AND provide a getInstance method. It's either-or, you
>> cannot have them both. But really, I don't get the point why you don't
>> want to use the new feature.
> 
> Ok, I posted a new version of the patch to BT (without t3lib_Singleton).
> 
> * * *
> 
> The rest is not to the Masi but rather a general conclusion :)
> 
> This was my final work on this feature and I am switching to other
> tasks now. I provided working autoload solution to TYPO3 and it is
> out of my hands now.

No, problem. Actually I volunteered in Berlin to creae an autoloader
with Ingo. Many thanx for your efforts!

> If core team wishes, the patch can be adapted
> to individual tastes of other core team members (such truly
> important things as variable names, underscores, caps, etc).

Hehe.

> But I
> am not going to make it because I am not interested in adapting code
> to different tastes.

Right you are. The onyl problem is that the opinions differ what is only
taste and what is a failure to follow rules (eg CGL).

Masi