[TYPO3-english] SPEED comparison of JS Frameworks

[ries van Twisk]

On Oct 22, 2008, at 3:54 AM, T.M.Snyder wrote:

>
>>
>> The fastest one (in FF2) is Peppy 0.1 beta, but it is limited to  
>> being a
>> DOM selector engine...
>
> I wasn't pointing out peppy.
> I found the site cool because of comparison of time used by  
> frameworks.
>
> And compared prototype to jquery, prototype is poor.
> It consumes 4x more time than jQuery.

Here prototype is twice as fast as JQuery... (62ms vs 113ms)

>
>
> And for an *Enterprise* CMS I don't think its good to use frameworks  
> who are
> slow and is much tooo big.
>
> Which means it takes too much time to load the code and then plus,  
> it takes
> up to 4 times more time to execute code....
> These negative things you don't have with e.g. jQuery or other  
> frameworks.


I do strongly believe that feature richness and stability is more  
important
then some framework is faster then a other framework (unless really  
slow for a other)
In the given testcase only DOM selections are done, and this is not  
what any CMS need (directly).

I do understand the reason for using prototype over anything else in  
TYPO3...........

Ries

>
>
> Thats what I wanted to say...
>
>>
>> -- 
>> Jigal van Hemert.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TYPO3-english mailing list
> TYPO3-english at lists.netfielders.de
> http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english



			regards, Ries van Twisk


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?