[TYPO3] Documentation nightmare

[Andreas Becker]

Hi Dimitry

+100 as a editor never knows about the inside of what the developer has
created as good as the developer itself. BUT a developer could have an
editor to whom he provides all necessary informations like most poltitician
talks will be written not by those who speak but by ghost writers. Both need
to be a very good Team then you get good documents. Especially if one is
more like a developer and the other more like the one using the extension as
i.e. editor.

Thanks
Andi

2008/3/14, Dmitry Dulepov [typo3] <dmitry at typo3.org>:
>
> Dan Osipov wrote:
> > I actually prefer the wiki - people can make modifications and correct
> > any errors in the article. They can discuss the article contents in the
> > discussion section, and ask for help. Changes can be tracked through an
> > RSS feed, much harder to do in the OO files.
>
>
> I do not think this is a right way to write docs. Doc should be written by
> author and reviewed by editor... Imagine TYPO3 Core API written by many
> people, it will be chaos.
>
>
> --
> Dmitry Dulepov
> TYPO3 core team
> Web: http://typo3bloke.net/
> Skype: callto:liels_bugs
> "Nothing is impossible. There are only limits to our knowledge"
> _______________________________________________
>
> TYPO3-english mailing list
> TYPO3-english at lists.netfielders.de
> http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
>