spetzl at gmx.at
Tue Dec 2 16:17:33 CET 2008
Dmitry Dulepov schrieb:
> Stephan Petzl wrote:
>> oh, never thought of this... maybee because i m writing an non TYPO3 php
>> application at the moment where i scale images too, and i never realised
>> any artefacts.
>> where exactly are the quality differences?
> Quite a lot. ImageMagick generally creates better JPEGs that GD. I have no idea why but I tired to compare once: same settings different quality. It is especially visible you have to resize a 8mpix image to a 450px width image and save as 60% quality JPEG.
there are actually a lot of php developers who are not aware of this
fact, good to know...
anyway- would be cool if TYPO3 would work without IM out of the box.
More information about the TYPO3-english