[TYPO3] *** POSSIBLE SPAM (3.5) *** Re: GPL Liscense and login / BE

[Tyler Kraft]

*ahem*

If only joomla had some of the capabilities of typo3 maybe then we'd 
take the comparison seriously....



Stephen Bungert wrote:
> 
> 
> Andrew Davis wrote:
>>  it seems clear to us that typo3 be needs serious
>> simplification. This is not a knock against Typo3. it is
>> straightforward enough and very powerful, but for joe-average, still
>> over their head.   
> 
> I have to agree with this. I have to re-design for our company sites 
> with a CMS. I choose TYPO3 because it's the only one that seem to let us 
> do what I need to plus works with multiple languages. I am worried 
> though about how to get the content editors to use it. Most don't speak 
> english or german fluently and, compared to say JOOMLA 1.5, is an ugly 
> old dinosaur. I think if JOOMLA 1.5 had been released as a final and had 
> good documentation in place for me to learn how it works I may have 
> choosen that, not because I think it's better, but because I think the 
> people that will have to edit the content would have a better chance of 
> using it.
> 
> Considering that TYPO3 is a CMS and not a development tool maybe the 
> devs could concentrate on making the next version more usable for 
> content editors, most of whom have trouble using interfaces like hotmail 
> and outlook express. I'm a bit concerned about whether TYPO3 is actually 
> only useable by web developers.