[TYPO3] Accessibility: Typo3 vs other CMS

[Denyer Ec]

On 3/29/07, Dmitry Dulepov <9f4eetb02 at sneakemail.com> wrote:

> I read that review and it is typical review from people who had only a
> short glance to typo3, did not understand it and therefore did not like
> it.
> --
> Dmitry Dulepov

Slightly off-topic, but this seems to be  a common problem with people
who review CMS systems for the masses. They install mambo/joomla/etc
and "pop", they have a site right away and can click, drag and write
dummy content. They install Typo3, get an error message, get a blank
page, get confused and give it a poor rating...
I have seen in other areas of computer journalism a "reviewers guide",
to aid a reviewer through the necessary steps of appraisal,
highlighting features that they otherwise might have missed.

I wonder if such a document would be of benefit to the TYPO3
organisation on a whole, or whether people feel that rave reviews and
larger scale uptake would be negative in some way?

Regards,
Denyerec