[TYPO3] date cached

Andrea Giorgini a.giorgini at norvlit.de
Fri Jul 28 14:07:34 CEST 2006

Dmitry Dulepov wrote:
> Hi!
> No, "10" is the object! But if you define it like you did, there is no 
> type for object "10"! Should be so:
> Dmitry.

Sometimes I am so stupid that I shock myself. Of course it's like that.
Sorry... and thank you again!


More information about the TYPO3-english mailing list