[TYPO3] Typo3 vs other CMSs
tapio.markula at dnainternet.net
Tue Jul 11 18:59:29 CEST 2006
Christoph Herrmann wrote:
> Hi all,
> I would like some opinions/feedback on the advantages Typo3 has over
> other CMSs.
> hours to upgrade to 4.0 and that broke everything, I had to learn
takes time but instead of making new versions of plugins you can
with small configuration make changes.
It takes time to learn TypoScript.
> In comparison: I started 1 hour ago to look into Joomla. Installed in 5
> minutes. Read and understood template creation tutorials and have
> already the first very basic template up and running.
AFAIK plugins are not so configurable. If there is no proper
configuration each change means a new version of plugin.
Typo3 has very flexible templating - but takes time to learn.
>The interface is much clearer
honestly I don't understand this. Mambo doesn't have page tree -
impossible to figure properly the structure of the site.
I dislike Mambo primary because of lacking representation of site structure.
> I have control over all aspects of my page/template, I did
> not have to learn a new coding language.
You don't but if you edit directly PHH + HTML stuff you can easily
make errors, which never happens with Typo3.
> hours to add a news elemtn, I just click an icon, I do not have to study
> for hours to add a blog element, I just click an icon etc etc.
but then you don't have proper configuration and if you want to change
something you must create a new version of the plugin.
Much different versions of the same plugin are in future impossible to
> So: When and why should I use Typo3 and not any of the other CMSs? What
> makes it more powerful?
flexible templating and configuration - configuration might take time in
> seeminhly easier options available?
If you want simpler then you automatic have less configuration and
solution is less flexible.
You choose - easy and not configurable - configurable but takes time
time to learn.
More information about the TYPO3-english