[Typo3] simulate static? pros and cons

[Ries van Twisk]

Jay Austad wrote:

>So, the general consensus seems to be to definitely use  
>simulateStatic or RealURL.  Do any extensions have problems with these?
>
>On Oct 3, 2005, at 4:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Rio wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Dmitry Dulepov wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi!
>>>
>>>Jay Austad wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Can anyone give me a list of reasons why I might want to simulate
>>>>static pages?
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Much better Google indexing -- much more visitors to your site.
>>>
>>>Urls are easier to remember -- looks more atractive (compare
>>>"http://mydomain.com/index.php?id=25843" with
>>>"http://mydomain.com/Cheapest_auto_parts.25843.html").
>>>
>>>Dmitry.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>+1
>>
>>Google indexing is the most interesting reason.
>>
>>Plus, the fact that it is Typo3 core function and not an external
>>extension. It works fine, it's fast and, for my point of view, the  
>>best
>>advantage is that it's MySQL free-consuming (no intermediate table  
>>as it
>>is in the my RealURL extension, if i remember well).
>>
>>Just M2P
>>
>>Jean-Baptiste
>>    
>>
I think simulateStatic doesn't show your tree structure well where as 
realUrl does that really great which will help SEO a lot.
We use realUrl...

Ries