[Typo3] simulate static? pros and cons

[Jay Austad]

So, the general consensus seems to be to definitely use  
simulateStatic or RealURL.  Do any extensions have problems with these?

On Oct 3, 2005, at 4:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Rio wrote:

> Dmitry Dulepov wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Jay Austad wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Can anyone give me a list of reasons why I might want to simulate
>>> static pages?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Much better Google indexing -- much more visitors to your site.
>>
>> Urls are easier to remember -- looks more atractive (compare
>> "http://mydomain.com/index.php?id=25843" with
>> "http://mydomain.com/Cheapest_auto_parts.25843.html").
>>
>> Dmitry.
>>
>
> +1
>
> Google indexing is the most interesting reason.
>
> Plus, the fact that it is Typo3 core function and not an external
> extension. It works fine, it's fast and, for my point of view, the  
> best
> advantage is that it's MySQL free-consuming (no intermediate table  
> as it
> is in the my RealURL extension, if i remember well).
>
> Just M2P
>
> Jean-Baptiste
> _______________________________________________
> Typo3-english mailing list
> Typo3-english at lists.netfielders.de
> http://lists.netfielders.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
>
>