[Typo3] class.tslib_pibase.php - removing <div>-tags around pagebrowser

[Arne Metzger]

Christopher schrieb:
> --- Arne Metzger <webmaster at shjjv.de> wrote:
> 
> 
>>hi christopher,
>>
>>Christopher schrieb:
>>
>>>Hi there,
>>>
>>>--- Arne Metzger <webmaster at shjjv.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>hi list!
>>>>
>>>>i am having a problem while getting my site to generate valid
>>
>>xhtml.
>>
>>>>on the frontpage, tt_news2.0.3 is used (code: latest) to show some
>>>>entries.
>>>>all code is valid, but the pagebrowser. it is placed in a <td> and 
>>>>wrapped with <div class="tx-ttnews-browsebox">:
>>>>
>>>><td colspan="3" align="center"><font 
>>>>style="font-family:arial,verdana,helvetica;font-size:14px;"><font 
>>>>color="#004263"><!----><!---->
>>>>
>>>>		<!--
>>>>			List browsing box:
>>>>		-->
>>>>		<div class="tx-ttnews-browsebox">
>>>>
>>>>			<table cellpadding="2">
>>>>
>>>>what can i do to get this little part to be valid xhtml?
>>>>the w3c-validator wont like those <div>-tags there...
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Well, the code is bloated, but what would the validator find wrong
>>>about a table (block-level element) inside a div (block-level
>>
>>element)?
>>
>>>-Christopher
>>
>>this is what the validator says:
>>[quote]
>>document type does not allow element "div" here; missing one of 
>>"object", "applet", "map", "iframe", "button", "ins", "del" start-tag
>>
>><div class="tx-ttnews-browsebox">
>>
>>The mentioned element is not allowed to appear in the context in
>>which 
>>you've placed it; the other mentioned elements are the only ones that
>>
>>are both allowed there and can contain the element mentioned. This
>>might 
>>mean that you need a containing element, or possibly that you've 
>>forgotten to close a previous element.
>>
>>One possible cause for this message is that you have attempted to put
>>a 
>>block-level element (such as "<p>" or "<table>") inside an inline 
>>element (such as "<a>", "<span>", or "<font>").
>>[/quote]
>>
>>i think it is the div inside a td...
>>
>>greetings,
>>arne
> 
> 
> 
> It's definitely NOT the div inside the td; that's a perfectly valid
> construction. Look a little further up the document for items occuring
> prior to the td even... The validator gets confused easily - especially
> over things like unquoted html attributes etc...
> 
> -Christopher

thought so, too.
But when the pagebrowser is not displayed (e.g. when only few newsitems 
are actual), the validator says

This Page Is Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!

Same page with pagebrowser... not valid.

Arne